I know it's a bit late for you for Valentine's Day (unless you are like me, in which case, this will work well for a last minute idea), but I always have a hard time buying cards to go with gifts. It feels a bit weird to me to pay upwards of $4 for someone to kinda sorta say how I feel for me. So I usually just ignore it and a shove a gift at someone, mumbling "This is from me, I hope you like it." Except when it comes to St. Valentine's Day.
When the rooster and I started dating, for some reason, though it is quite out of character for both of us, we decided to have a sickeningly sweet first Valentine's together (perhaps because we weren't actually together - we were dating long distance). So I made him a little booklet with an illustrated poem.
Though my rhyming skills have fallen off over the years, and it seems they get uglier and uglier as the years go by, the tradition of me making him a little illustrated booklet in lieu of a card has stuck. They are not very pretty to look at - that's kind of part of the tradition - but they are heartfelt and they always have a theme.
I have seen a few similar tutorials online about ruffling but not much dealing with the "knife-edge" type pillow (as opposed to one that is more disk shaped). Here, using leftover fabric from my duvet cover, I make a simple, round, ruffled, throw pillow. The ruffling is what makes it so forgiving of messed up measurements, crooked sewing, and other gaffs.
We start with two strips of fabric of equal length and width (I am going to rip off the hemmed edge on the piece shown here). The dimensions of the strips depend on the dimensions of the pillow. I would recommend doubling the circumference for the length and having the radius plus 2 inches for the width. Making the strip shorter means you will have fewer/shallower ruffles. Making the strips narrower means you will have to have a larger center piece.
Every Monday or so on my blog will be Mad Science
Monday.On these days my posts will be
related to science.
I have mentioned on my Facebook page that I will
have a series "Modern Wives' Tales: Examining, Explaining, Debunking or
Improving Old Wives' Tales."
I also intend to have small blurbs about the
science that occurs in the home arts (I foresee a lot related to cooking, since
cooking is mostly chemistry!), like the mentions I have already made in recipes
(e.g. why you should bloom your spices before using them in a slow cooker).
Most
importantly, I plan a series of educational activities for children.
To understand why I plan to have these posts (and why they
are different from the majority approach of the world), it is helpful to understand
some of my philosophy about science and science literacy.
I taught Physics for Elementary Education Majors for a
number of years.Most of my students
resented having to be there because they "wouldn't be teaching this stuff to
kids".But I always started the
semester with a little motivation.
Science is not about
knowing a set of facts.Science is a way
of thinking about the world.
When I was a kid, the only "science" we had in
elementary school was identifying things.We named the clouds.We named
whales.We named dinosaurs.This is not science.This is
stamp collecting.
Happily, our education system is changing, and students are
learning to focus less and less on "what" and more and more on
"how" and "why."Kids are naturally curious about the world they live in. They observe
and test how it works.They ask
"why" (Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?)It can be really annoying at times!
Somewhere along the line, most people stop doing this.But when we stop asking why and how, we are
less able to critically evaluate the world we live in.We don't ask how and why about the line a politician is feeding
us.We don't ask how or why about the
claims some manufacturer is making about a product.Every day we are asked to make decisions with
our votes and with our pocketbooks and we will be ill-equipped to do so if we
don't approach these decisions with a scientific way of thinking (understand, I
am not saying cold or unemotional).As
the National Academy of Sciences puts it, in addition to understanding some
aspects of science facts (what one might consider "book learnin"), a
scientifically literate person can pose and evaluate arguments based on
evidence and apply conclusions from such arguments appropriately.Don't you think an increase in this rational
approach, say, in the political arena, would benefit society greatly?
My Mad Science Monday posts are my attempt to infuse science
into our daily lives.It will never be
enough to simply observe what happened.For instance, when I post about what best works to remove the onion funk
from your hands, I will never leave it there.You will know how and why.I
expect to spend hours reading academic journals about the compounds released by
the onion, the interaction with the skin, and how to neutralize it.I will put it in non-scientific terms but I
will never dumb it down.When I post
kids' science experiments, it will never end at "see what
happened."Sometimes the parent or guardian
won't know the answer. Sometimes the answer is a little too complicated for
developing minds. But it isn't science unless you at least think about how and
why a thing happens.
Here's an example of when asking how and why can help avoid catastrophic consequences.
To illustrate why delving into the how and why of a what is important, consider the low birth-weight paradox (an example of the very fascinating Simpson's Paradox). The "what" here is that low-birth weight children born to smoking mothers have lower infant mortality than low-birth-weight children born to non-smoking mothers. If we were to stop here, to not consider the how and why of this observation, we might decide that women who are at risk of delivering low birth-weight babies for other reasons should begin (or continue) smoking through pregnancy. However, because we know that smoking is generally bad for health, we intuit that this makes no sense.
We are right. We have to think of the how and why. Smoking during pregnancy causes increased likelihood of low birth-weight. So the infants born to smoking mothers will represent a whole range of conditions, but most of them will only have low birth-weight and no other health conditions to contend with. The infants born to non-smoking mothers are generally of normal weight. But, of course, at least some of the babies born to non-smoking mothers will still have low birth weight. And these babies will typically be of low birth-weight because they have some other malady that is a much greater risk to their health than low birth-weight alone.
By focusing only on the "what" and not the "how" or the "why," we gloss over the proper conclusion to the data: smoking doesn't make low-birth weight infants healthier; it makes generally healthy infants low-birth weight.
Of course, this case seems obvious to us, but if we don't think about why and how, we don't think about what other information we might need to make a decision (here it would be useful to know the relative numbers of low birth-weight to normal birth-weight infants in each group!).
I think that approaching life this way is important because
it is empowering.Of course, there are
questions in life that will never have a testable answer (then we get into
philosophy and theology), but to understand the mechanisms of the world around
you is to be able to influence those mechanisms.I want that empowerment everyone, especially
our children.
*End motivational speech*
If you have some science-y topic you would like to know more
about, please let me know.In the
comments, I’d like to hear about your experiences with science in school!Also, has there been a time when you have
been (or wished you were more) empowered by science literacy?
Disclaimer: The "fast" part is in the preparation - you know, since slow cookers are, by definition, slow. This recipe is adapted from a stew recipe in the book Slow Cooker Revolution, which, if you want to really learn how to be a slow cooker ninja, I highly recommend. It is very hearty and freezes great.
Pro Tip about "blooming" aromatics and spices.
You should "bloom" your onion, celery, garlic, and seasonings by microwaving or sauteing with 2Tbsps of oil for about 5 min (stir halfway in the microwave) or until the onion is soft. Blooming makes a big difference to flavor because a.) Your slow cooker doesn't reach the temperatures necessary to cause the chemical reactions that make the beautiful onion-y, herb-y, and spice-y flavor complexities and b.) These flavors are soluble in oil, not water so it is useful to first extract the flavors into an oil (olive oil and butter are my favorites) and then distribute that oil (and thus the flavor) throughout the dish.With out blooming, the great flavors of your herbs and spices remain trapped and cannot reach their full potential. When I am in a hurry, as I was here, I skip the blooming before slow cooking and I always regret it.
Prep Time: Less than 10 minutes Cook time 5-7 hours on High, 9-11 hours on Low + 30 minutes on High Ingredients:
Recommended: 2Tbsp of some oil
1 Large onion, chopped
1 rib celery, chopped
6 cloves garlic, minced
Seasoning
2 bay leaves (I use more because mine are pretty old)
1/4 tsp Cayenne pepper
1/2 tsp thyme (you can really up this you like more herb-y-ness)
2 tsp paprika
Generous grinding of pepper
1 lb dried red kidney beans
14oz (or 1 package) of your preferred sausage (I use a smoked sausage, but andouille would be great), cut to your preferred size (I prefer to quarter the link then slice in 1/2 chunks so I get a piece of sausage in almost every bite)
Liquid
4 c chicken stock (I actually use a sodium free bullion and water and it turns out pretty well)
3 c water
1 1/2 c rice
(After blooming) Add everything but the rice to your slow cooker and cook for 5-7 hours on High or 9-11 hours on Low. Add your rice and cook on high for 1/2 hour. You may wish to add more seasonings (I like hot sauce on mine). Enjoy!
I've been meaning to make a new cover for my feather comforter for some
time now. Since the cover is fairly large, and since it will be filled
with something fluffy, this is a project that is very forgiving of
stitching (and even cutting) that isn't straight.
We have a queen sized bed and I wanted to make some matching pillowcases and throw pillows, so I bought a king flat sheet and a coordinating king sheet set to use for fabric (bought after the new year, when linens are on sale, this cost me less than $25). I think this was plenty for us but if you have a king bed you might need to buy another flat sheet or some fabric. Before you ever get started, make sure to pre-wash and dry your fabric so that it has already shrunk as much as it is going to. Iron the fabric so that you make accurate measurements and cuts.
To make the duvet cover, you are really just sewing large rectangle that has an opening in one end. Measure your comforter width and length and measure, mark, and cut your two flat sheets so that you allow for a seam allowance and, if you choose to do this part, the french seam/sham flange edge. I generally do a 1/2" seam allowance and I did about a 1" flange so I added 3" to my comforter dimensions. I would not recommend making the duvet cover oversized for the comforter because I think you tend to get more lumping that way.
This is one of our favorite weeknight meals. It makes a fairly large pot of food (I think we get 8 pretty generous portions out of it - this will depend on how much squash you use) and it freezes beautifully. It takes about 30 - 45 minutes from start to finish, depending on how fast you can cut up produce (if you don't buy pre-cut) and how mushy you like the squash cooked.
It is based off a recipe from Better Homes and Gardens but I have made a few substitutions to make it less hoity-toity (Who can find pappardelle in their typical grocery?? And why Marsala instead of whatever dry red wine you have on had? Pine nuts?? BHG, do you know how much pine nuts cost?? This is really uncharacteristically haughty for them.) and to change the flavor profile slightly (I like marjoram more than sage but I think dill, thyme, savory, rosemary, and pretty much anything else would work great too.
First off, these things are gorgeous. Just beautiful. But they are also super tasty - like crispy, orange toffee. They seem to also go by the name Florentines.
My first post should really be titled "Half-finished endeavours." It will be about some
project I am working on (with pictures!) and then I will immediately put
up a post with a recipe that worked really well for me (Pecan Lace cookies). Thanks for stopping by.
My hubby and I
recently bought a Rococo revival couch at an antique store and, though I
love it, it looks a bit bare. So the current project is rev it up with
a bunch of throw pillows. It is a yellow couch so I am going with a
bunch of navy and cream fabrics for the pillow. The centerpiece is a
Napoleonic royal bee that I have finally finished embroidering and the
circular pillows will have large embroidered G's.
This blog's name is in reference to the Scottish Little Hen Nursery Rhyme: I had a little hen, the prettiest ever seen, She washed me the dishes, and kept the house clean: She went to the mill to fetch me some flour, She brought it home in less than an hour; She baked me my bread, she brew’d me my ale, She sat by the fire and told many a fine tale. This is not to be confused with the fable of the Little Red Hen. I will gladly share the bread I make, even if I had to make it all by myself! Oh, and I have freckles.